California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Arnold v. Mutual of Omaha Ins., A131440

In an appeal from summary judgment in defendant's favor in a Labor Code action for unpaid employee entitlements, judgment is affirmed because the court correctly concluded that the common law test for employment applied to determine whether plaintiff, who was defendant's nonexclusive insurance agent, was an "employee," instead of the broader statutory definition of "employee" contained in Labor Code section 2750.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/30/2011
  • Published 12/30/2011

Judges

  • Marchiano

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel