California Court of Appeal

In an appeal from a judgment of the trial court dismissing plaintiffs' complaint for labor and wages violations, judgment is: 1) affirmed because plaintiff was not entitled to receive reporting time pay for attending meetings at work, where all the meetings were scheduled and plaintiff worked at least half the scheduled time; and 2) affirmed as he was not owed additional compensation for working split shifts, where on each occasion he worked a split shift he earned more than the minimum amount required by a wage order; but 3) reversed on the trial court's award of attorney fees to the defendant since plaintiffs' claims were subject to Labor Code section 1194.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/21/2011
• Published 12/21/2011

Judges

• BOREN

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel