California Court of Appeal
Bautista v. State of California, B226102
In an appeal from a judgment of the trial court dismissing plaintiffs' complaint alleging that the current State heat illness prevention regulation does not ensure, in derogation of Article XIV, Section 4 of the State constitution, the safety of farm workers from heat-related illnesses, judgment is affirmed where plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action because Article XIV is not self-executing.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/06/2011
- Published 12/06/2011
Judges
Court
- California Court of Appeal