California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Bautista v. State of California, B226102

In an appeal from a judgment of the trial court dismissing plaintiffs' complaint alleging that the current State heat illness prevention regulation does not ensure, in derogation of Article XIV, Section 4 of the State constitution, the safety of farm workers from heat-related illnesses, judgment is affirmed where plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action because Article XIV is not self-executing.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/06/2011
  • Published 12/06/2011

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel