California Court of Appeal

In an appeal from an order of the trial court directing appellant to pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $5,250 to plaintiff, judgment is affirmed where, in determining whether appellant had comply with its discovery order, the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to hold an in camera document inspection for the purpose of deciding whether a monetary sanction was appropriate or in imposing a monetary sanction without conducting an in camera inspection.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/21/2011
• Published 11/21/2011

Judges

• ELIA

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Weil & Drage and Jean A. Weil, Anthony D. Platt and Sheila K. McDonald, Attorneys for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Corsiglia, McMahon & Allard and B. Robert Allard and Jeffry W. Lochner, Attorneys for Respondent.