California Court of Appeal

In an appeal from a judgment of the trial court denying defendants' motion to compel arbitration, judgment is affirmed where: 1) the court correctly concluded that the subject arbitration clause was reasonably susceptible to conflicting interpretations; and 2) the court acted within its discretion in considering extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent, including the receipt of additional oral testimony at a special hearing.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/28/2011
• Published 09/28/2011

Judges

• CROSKEY

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel