California Court of Appeal
Duick v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., B224839
In an appeal from a judgment of the trial court denying defendant's motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff's causes of action including intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, and false advertising, judgment is affirmed where putative contract is void on account of fraud in the inception.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/31/2011
- Published 08/31/2011
Judges
- ROTHSCHILD
Court
- California Court of Appeal