California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Duick v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., B224839

In an appeal from a judgment of the trial court denying defendant's motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff's causes of action including intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, and false advertising, judgment is affirmed where putative contract is void on account of fraud in the inception.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/31/2011
  • Published 08/31/2011

Judges

  • ROTHSCHILD

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel