California Court of Appeal
Charter Communications Properties v. County of San Luis Obispo, B226390
In an appeal from a judgment of the trial court affirming the determination of the fair market value of a television cable franchise, California Code of Regulations Title 18 Rule 21(d)(1), based on an anticipated term of possession longer than the remaining years of the stated term of each franchise agreement, judgment is affirmed where the Assessment Appeals Board, in compliance with Rule 21, found clear and convincing evidence of a mutual understanding between the County and the owner of franchises that the reasonably anticipated terms of possession of the franchises were longer than their stated terms of possession.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/30/2011
- Published 08/30/2011
Judges
- COFFEE
Court
- California Court of Appeal