California Court of Appeal

In a labor dispute concerning whether defendant's sabbatical program was legally a vacation such that defendant could not require an employee to forfeit pay on vested but unused sabbatical hours, Labor Code section 227.3, summary judgment in favor of the defendant is reversed where, on the record, the matter cannot be decided as a matter of law.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/05/2011
• Published 08/05/2011

Judges

• Premo

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel