California Court of Appeal

Revocation of defendant's parole following a Penal Code section 288 conviction and sentencing is affirmed as modified, because even if challenged parole condition were constitutionally infirm, any error is harmless where defendant’s conduct was such that it would breach the condition regardless of how narrowly or precisely worded the condition was, and where defendant is entitled to additional custody credit such that a second restitution fine must be stricken.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/19/2011
• Published 07/19/2011

Judges

• NICHOLSON

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel