California Court of Appeal
Ulta Salon, Cosmetics and Fragrance, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, B224584
Read Ulta Salon, Cosmetics and Fragrance, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, B224584
READ
READ
In an insurance coverage action involving whether defendant had a duty to defend or indemnity plaintiff in an underlying action alleging violations of Proposition 65, the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, by the plaintiff, judgment of the trial court dismissing action is affirmed where the defendant did not owe plaintiff a defense because neither the pleadings nor the extrinsic evidence in the underlying action revealed a possibility that the Proposition 65 claim might be covered by the relevant policy.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/11/2011
- Published 07/11/2011
Judges
- KLEIN
Court
- California Court of Appeal