California Court of Appeal

In a challenge to a one-year extension of defendant's commitment on the grounds that the trial court erred by allowing defendant to represent himself at the extension trial, judgment of the trial court is affirmed where no reasonable probability exists that defendant would have obtained a more favorable result if he had been represented by counsel at trial.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/20/2011
• Published 06/20/2011

Judges

• IKOLA

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel