California Court of Appeal

In a dispute involving an attorney who entered into business transactions with his clients without the written disclosures required by Rule 3-300 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, judgment of the trial court is affirmed where court properly denied the attorney leave to amend his complaint to state a cause of action for the reasonable value of his services on account of his Rule 3-300 violation.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/24/2011
• Published 05/24/2011

Judges

• Kline

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel