California Court of Appeal

In an action for fraud and intentional interference with prospective advantage arising from a contigency fee arrangment between plaintiff-attorney and defendants, judgment of the trial court dismissing complaint is affirmed where action is barred by public policy articulated in well-established California Supreme Court precedent.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/05/2011
• Published 05/06/2011

Judges

• GRIMES

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel