California Court of Appeal

Conviction and sentencing of defendant on an assortment of kidnapping, robbery, rape, and sex crime charges is upheld where: 1) modified CALCRIM No. 1191 was proper; 2) testimony by witness regarding a rape exams she did not perform was not a Sixth Amendment violation; 3) admission of a preliminary hearing testimony into evidence was not erroneous; 4) testimony was properly admitted as prior consistent statement; 5) CALCRIM No. 220 instruction was proper; and 6) sufficient evidence supports the finding that the use of a stun gun by defendant constituted deadly or dangerous weapon.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/12/2011
• Published 04/12/2011

Judges

• RUBIN

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel