California Court of Appeal

In an insurance dispute arising from an action to obtain reimbursement from defendant for payment on a policy limits in the absence of an express agreement, judgment of the trial court is reversed where the addition of a fact intensive inquiry into the sufficiency of the time to respond to a settlement advisement letter by trial court was erroneous.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/08/2011
• Published 04/08/2011

Judges

• FYBEL

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David W. Evans, Maziar Mafi