California Court of Appeal

In a habeas challenge to the denial of parole to petitioner on the ground that he is not a suitable parole candidate, petition is denied where there is some evidence supporting decision that petitioner is currently dangerous to the public, and a three-year minimum denial period for parole consideration under PC section 3041.5 (b)(3), as amended, does not violate the prohibition against the imposition of ex post facto laws.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/08/2011
• Published 04/08/2011

Judges

• BENKE

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Keith Wattley, Edmund G. Brown