California Court of Appeal

In plaintiffs' suit against defendant-creditor alleging causes of action for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, rescission, and reformation, arising from a breach of a written forbearance agreement, trial court's grant of defendant's motion for summary judgment is reversed as, because plaintiffs' evidence of misrepresentations fell within the fraud exception to the parol evidence rule, the evidence should have been admitted to raise a triable issue of material fact in opposition to defendant's motion.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/03/2011
• Published 01/03/2011

Judges

• HILL

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Steven E. Paganetti, Scott J. Ivy