California Court of Appeal

In a dispute over accounting irregularities between partners in an adult entertainment business, trial court's denial of defendant's motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute is affirmed as the motion was properly denied because the complaint did not arise from any protected activity on defendant's part, but from a business dispute between the parties, and the mention of any protected activity was merely incidental.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/15/2010
• Published 10/15/2010

Judges

• MOORE

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David J. Harter, Bruce W. Wagner