Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

California Court of Appeal


Purdum v. Holmes, B216493

In plaintiff's action against a licensed notary for knowingly notarizing a third-party's signature on a deed as if it were plaintiff's, purporting to transfer plaintiff's interest to the third-party, trial court's judgment is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion when it set aside defendant's default; and 2) trial court correctly concluded that each of plaintiff's causes of action against defendant was barred by the six-year maximum limitation period that is prescribed for an action against a notary in his official capacity by section 338(f)(3), regardless of delayed discovery.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/29/2010
  • Published 08/20/2010

Judges

  • COFFEE

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

Copied to clipboard