California Court of Appeal
Purdum v. Holmes, B216493
In plaintiff's action against a licensed notary for knowingly notarizing a third-party's signature on a deed as if it were plaintiff's, purporting to transfer plaintiff's interest to the third-party, trial court's judgment is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion when it set aside defendant's default; and 2) trial court correctly concluded that each of plaintiff's causes of action against defendant was barred by the six-year maximum limitation period that is prescribed for an action against a notary in his official capacity by section 338(f)(3), regardless of delayed discovery.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/29/2010
- Published 08/20/2010
Judges
- COFFEE
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Wayne T. King, Raul L. Martinez