California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Khan v. Los Angeles City Employees' Ret. Sys., B214685

Trial court's judgment in favor of plaintiff granting his petition for writ of mandate compelling the Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System (LACERS) to approve his request for concurrent deferred retirement benefits with LACERS and the Judicial Retirement System (JRS), is reversed and remanded where: 1) there is no reciprocity between LACERS and JRS/JRS II, such that plaintiff, a judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County who had worked for the City of Los Angeles as a City Attorney, may retire from LACERS at his higher judicial salary; and 2) provisions relating to the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL) do not control the court's analysis.

Appellate Information

  • Submitted 08/03/2010
  • Decided 08/03/2010
  • Published 08/03/2010




  • California Court of Appeal


Copied to clipboard