Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc., B212672

In a stockholder's suit against a company and individual directors, claiming that both the acquisition process, and the common stock arising from the acquisition were unfair, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded where: 1) the doctrine of shareholder ratification does not bar the intervenor's claims; 2) the intervenor's complaint, which consists of a single cause of action states facts sufficient for a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duties as to the individual directors; and 3) trial court's judgment sustaining the demurrer as to the company is affirmed.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/21/2010
  • Published 06/21/2010


  • RUBIN, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, Randall J. Baron, Kevin K. Green and David T. Wissbroecker, for Plaintiff and Intervenor-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Fenwick & West, Kevin P. Muck, Felix S. Lee and Christine A. Vogelei, for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard