California Court of Appeal
Rogers v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., C061943
In plaintiff's suit against a manufacturer of the helicopter she was piloting at the time of her crash, a grant of defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence that the maintenance manual was defective and caused the accident, and its subsequent grant of defendant's motion for a nonsuit are reversed as the maintenance manual here was not a part of the helicopter for purposes of the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/04/2010
- Published 06/04/2010
Judges
- ROBIE, J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Franecke Law Group and Louis Stanton Franecke for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- The Ryan Law Group, Timothy J. Ryan and Stephen E. Paffrath for Defendant and Respondent.