Mabry v. Superior Court, G042911
In homeowners' petition for a writ of mandate challenging an order of the trial court, allowing for foreclosure to proceed on their home, is granted in part and remanded to the trial court to determine whether or not the lender complied with Civil Code section 2923.5. To the extent that the trial court's order precludes the assertion of any class action claims, the petition is denied.
- Decided 06/02/2010
- Published 06/02/2010
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Law Offices of Moses S. Hall and Moses S. Hall for Petitioners., Akerman Senterfitt, Justin D. Balser and Donald M. Scotten for Real Party in Interest., McCarthy & Holthus, Matthew Podmenik, Charles E. Bell and Melissa Robbins Contts for Real Party in Interest Quality Loan Service Corporation., Bryan Cave, Douglas E. Winter, Christopher L. Dueringer, Sean D. Muntz and Kamae C. Shaw for Amici Curiae Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Servicing on behalf of Real Parties in Interest., Wright, Finlay & Zak, Thomas Robert Finlay and Jennifer A. Johnson for Amici Curiae United Trustee's Association and California Mortgage Association., Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.
- For Appellees:
- No appearance for Respondent.