California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Scalzo v. Am. Express Co., B213636

In plaintiff's action for invasion of privacy, violation of California Financial Information Privacy Act, and other claims, trial court's grant of two special motions to strike is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded where: 1) trial court's grant of defendant's special motion to strike is reversed as plaintiff's evidentiary support is sufficient to establish the requisite prima facie showing, and defendant has failed to establish as a matter of law that plaintiff cannot succeed on the merits showing that the claimed illegal acts occurred and caused damage unrelated to the underlying litigation; and 2) trial court's grant of the remaining defendants' special motion to strike is affirmed.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/28/2010
  • Published 05/28/2010

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

Copied to clipboard