Glendale Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los Angeles, B212718
In a petition for writ of mandate by community redevelopment agencies seeking an order that county accept their revised Statement of Indebtedness (SOI) and pay additional sums for the year in question, trial court's denial of the petition is reversed as nothing in section 33675 prohibits a redevelopment agency from correcting errors in an SOI by filing a revised document.
- Decided 05/25/2010
- Published 05/25/2010
- California Court of Appeal
- For Appellant:
- Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Douglas J. Evertz; Glendale City Attorney's Office, Gillian van Muyden, General Counsel, for Plaintiff and Appellant Glendale Redevelopment Agency., Goldfarb & Lipman, John T. Nagle, Juliet E. Cox for Plaintiff and Appellant Redevelopment Agency of the City of Compton., McDonough Holland & Allen, T. Brent Hawkins for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Elizabeth M. Cortez, Assistant County Counsel, Thomas M. Tyrrell, Principal Deputy County Counsel for Defendant and Respondent.