Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


Laclette v. Galindo, B213615

In plaintiffs' legal malpractice action against defendants, trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants is reversed as a triable issue of material fact exists as to whether defendant attorney continued to represent plaintiff during the pendency of a settlement agreement in the underlying action so as to toll the limitations period in the malpractice action.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/17/2010
  • Published 05/17/2010

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • George Baltaxe for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Waxler, Carner, Brodsky, Gretchen S. Carner and Diana J. Coburn for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard