California Court of Appeal

In plaintiff's suit against a city concerning the city's mobilehome rent control ordinances, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as the court properly ruled that plaintiff was not entitled to damages where: 1) plaintiff has not established that the trial court erred in ruling that plaintiff did not suffer any legally remediable injury due to the retroactive application of the ordinance at issue; and 2) trial court correctly ruled that plaintiff may not recover damages for the city's violation of its right to petition under the California Constitution.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/15/2010
• Published 03/15/2010

Judges

• IRION, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Robie & Matthai, Steven S. Fleischman; Jenner & Block, David J. Bradford and Bradley M. Yusim, for Plaintiff and Appellant and for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant., Best, Best & Krieger, James B. Gilpin, Melissa W. Wood and Matthew L. Green, for Defendant and Respondent and for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent.