California Court of Appeal

In plaintiff's claim that the city violated the CEQA when it assessed a fee for her appeal to the city council of a planning commission decision, trial court's decision sustaining defendant's demurrer is affirmed as plaintiff does not indicate how she could amend her complaint to avoid the demurrer, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/01/2010
• Published 03/01/2010

Judges

• JOHNSON, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Briggs Law Corporation, Cory J. Briggs and Mekaela M. Gladden for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Law Offices of Leech & Associates and D. Wayne Leech for Defendants and Respondents.