California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

In re Marcos G., B215969

In dependency proceedings, an order denying a father's 388 petition and terminating his parental rights is affirmed where: 1) although there was a failure to follow certain notice provisions, the error was not prejudicial; and 2) father's section 388 petition was not an abuse of discretion.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/26/2010
  • Published 02/26/2010

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

Copied to clipboard