California Court of Appeal

Trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-insurance company, arising from defendant's argument that plaintiff's claims were not covered by the policies as "advertising injury" or "proerty damage," the order denying the motion to quash is not appealable where, as here, the party contesting jurisdiction enters a general appearance and litigates the merits. Furthermore, the claims asserted in the Illinois actions were not covered by the State Farm policies.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/27/2010
• Published 01/27/2010

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Law Offices of Ryan G. Richardson, Ryan G. Richardson;  Law Offices of Leah Nico and Phillip A. Bock for Defendant and Appellant., Robie & Matthai and James R. Robie, Steven S. Fleischman and David J. Weinman for Plaintiff and Respondent.