California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Haro v. Ibarra, B213499

In an action brought by doctors who were former shareholders of a medical corporation, trial court's dismissal of the complaint is reversed and remanded where: 1) the second amended complaint states a cause of action; and 2) equitable circumstances alleged in the case warrant an exception to the requirement that plaintiffs maintain continuous ownership of the shares in order to bring a shareholder derivative action.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/23/2009
  • Published 12/23/2009


  • CHANEY, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellant:
  • Nunziato Buckley Weber,Tom A. Nunziato and Illece Buckley Weber for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Christensen & Auer, Stephen G. Auer and Vicki C. Gadbois for Defendants and Respondents Alpha Medical Management, LLC and Medical Management Consultants, LLC., Herzfeld & Rubin, Craig L. Winterman and Stephanie L. Rockey for Defendants and Respondents Fernando Ibarra, Alfonso Barragan, Manuel Figueroa, Maria Christina Hernandez and Omar Perez., Reback, McAndrews, Kjar, Warford & Stockalper, Robert C. Reback and Thien T. Nguyen for Defendant and Respondent Associated Hispanic Physicians of Southern California, Inc.
Copied to clipboard