Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

California Court of Appeal


Howe v. Bank of America N.A., G040669

In plaintiffs' putative class action suit against defendant and other entities claiming discrimination under the Unruh Civil Rights Act by requiring that U.S. citizens provide a Social Security number to open a particular type of credit card account, while allowing foreign nationals to open such accounts with only alternative forms of identification, trial court's order sustaining defendant's demurrer to the complaint is affirmed where: 1) as a matter of law, Bank of America did not act arbitrarily as 31 C.F.R. section 103.121, which was enacted pursuant to the legislation commonly known as The USA Patriotic Act, expressly requires defendant to obtain Social Security numbers from U.S. citizens; and 2) because defendant's credit card program merely applied federally imposed minimum identification standards to all applicants for its accounts, the practice bears a reasonable relationship to Bank of America's commercial objectives and was consequently valid on its face.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/08/2009
  • Published 12/08/2009

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • The Rava Law Firm and Alfred G. Rava for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Morrison & Foerster, Arturo J. Gonzalez, William L. Stern, San Francisco, and Claudia M. Vetesi, for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard