Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


Oddone v. Sup. Ct., B213784

In plaintiff's suit on behalf of her deceased husband against his former employer claiming that his brain tumor was caused by exposure to toxic chemicals while working for Technicolor, plaintiff's petition challenging an order sustaining defendant's demurrer to a claim that plaintiff was injured by exposure to toxic chemicals and vapors on her husband's clothing and person that he brought home is denied where Technicolor does not owe plaintiff a duty of due care, as plaintiff's attempts to state a cause of action fall short of the Rowland criteria.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/24/2009
  • Published 11/24/2009

Judges

  • FLIER, Acting P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Gonzalez & Robinson, Joseph D. Gonzalez and Keith A. Robinson, Westlake Village, for Petitioner., Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, Hayward J. Kaiser and Paul Guelpa, Los Angeles, for Real Party in Interest.

  • For Appellees:
  • No appearance for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard