California Court of Appeal

In plaintiff's action against her former employer for sexual harassment under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, judgment in favor of the employer is affirmed where: 1) a statement in defendant's statement of undisputed facts submitted in its summary judgment motion cannot be used against defendant at trial as an admission; and 2) trial court did not err in denying plaintiff's motion for JNOV as plaintiff waived her claim that no substantial evidence supports the defense verdict.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/26/2009
• Published 10/26/2009

Judges

• SIMS, Acting P.J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Law Offices of Stephan Williams and Stephan C. Williams, Walnut Creek;  Law Offices of Daniel Bartley and Daniel R. Bartley, Novato, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Curiale Hirschfeld Kraemer, John F. Baum and Felicia R. Reid, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.