Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

California Court of Appeal


Canandaigua Wine Co. v. County of Madera, F055858

Plaintiff's appeal from an order summarily adjudicating one of the three causes of action in its petition for writ of administrative mandate involving the assessment of a winery is dismissed where a ruling on a petition for writ of mandate is not appealable if other causes of action remain pending between the parties.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/02/2009
  • Published 09/02/2009

Judges

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Winston & Strawn, Charles J. Moll III, Amanda L. Groves, Troy M. Van Dongen and Kathleen F. McConnell, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Cota Cole & Associates, Oakland, Dennis M. Cota and Carolyn J. Frank, Sherman Oaks, for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard