California Court of Appeal
Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop, B206272
In an appeal from the trial court's order quashing service of summons and process on the Archdiocese of Cashel & Emly in Ireland regarding alleged sexual molestation by clergy, the order is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff waived the issue by his failure to fairly and completely set forth, discuss, and analyze the relevant facts under the applicable substantial evidence standard of review; and 2) substantial evidence supported the trial court's ruling that defendant had insufficient contacts with the State of California to support an exercise of either general or specific jurisdiction.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/01/2009
- Published 09/01/2009
Judges
- RUBIN, ACTING P.J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Manley & Stewart, John C. Manly and Vince W. Finaldi, Newport Beach, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Nicholas W. Heldt, Cynthia H. Plevin and Ryan L. Harrison, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.