Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. R.P., B208425

Juvenile court order continuing defendant as a ward of the state and imposing a probation condition prohibiting him from possessing any dangerous or deadly weapon is affirmed where: 1) there is no merit to defendant's claim that the probation condition is unconstitutionally vague as the condition has a plain common-sense meaning and is sufficiently precise for defendant to know what is required of him; and 2) the mere possibility peace officers may attempt to enforce the probation condition as a strict liability offense does not render the condition unconstitutional.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/07/2009
  • Published 08/07/2009


  • KLEIN, P.J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • Torres & Torres, Tonja R. Torres, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Susan D. Martynec and Robert M. Snider, Deputy Attorneys General for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard