California Court of Appeal
Mednik v. State Dept. of Health Care Serv., B193269
Trial court order denying plaintiff's petition for writ of mandate is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's exclusion from the Medi-Cal program amounted to disbarment and he therefore has a liberty interest at stake; 2) plaintiff has not identified any aspect of the administrative appeal procedure in connection with his temporary suspension and denial of reenrollment which fell short of the demands of due process; and 3) there is no support for plaintiff's allegation that the trial court lacked the complete administrative record.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/30/2009
- Published 06/30/2009
Judges
- EPSTEIN, P.J.
Court
- California Court of Appeal
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Landau & Landau, Bruce G. Landau; Law Office of Laura Seraso and Laura Seraso for Plaintiff and Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Douglas M. Press, Assistant Attorney General, Richard T. Waldow, Erin S. Kubota and Gala E. Dunn, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.