California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Mednik v. State Dept. of Health Care Serv., B193269

Trial court order denying plaintiff's petition for writ of mandate is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's exclusion from the Medi-Cal program amounted to disbarment and he therefore has a liberty interest at stake; 2) plaintiff has not identified any aspect of the administrative appeal procedure in connection with his temporary suspension and denial of reenrollment which fell short of the demands of due process; and 3) there is no support for plaintiff's allegation that the trial court lacked the complete administrative record.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/30/2009
  • Published 06/30/2009

Judges

  • EPSTEIN, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Landau & Landau, Bruce G. Landau;  Law Office of Laura Seraso and Laura Seraso for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Douglas M. Press, Assistant Attorney General, Richard T. Waldow, Erin S. Kubota and Gala E. Dunn, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard