California Court of Appeal

In an appeal from a postjudgment order requiring defendant to turn a domain name over to plaintiff to satisfy a judgment, the order is reversed where: 1) plaintiff could not obtain an order directing the turnover of intangible property directly to it; and 2) plaintiff failed to show that defendant was in possession of the domain name.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/16/2009
• Published 06/16/2009

Judges

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Peters & Freedman, Michael G. Kim and Simon J. Freedman, Encinitas for Plaintiff and Respondent., Arnold A. McMahon, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.