California Court of Appeal

In an action alleging intentional and negligent interference with a contractual relationship, trial court's grant of defendant's motion for summary judgment is affirmed where: 1) no cause of action for negligent interference with contractual relations exists in California; and 2) plaintiff did not raise a triable issue of fact with regard to a possible cause of action for intentional interference with contract as he offered no evidence that there was an actual breach of his partnership contract, and thus, cannot prove a cause of action against defendant for interference with that contract.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/21/2009
• Published 05/21/2009

Judges

• ALDRICH, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Joseph Daniel Davis, Los Angeles, and Charlotte E. Costan, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Law Offices of John C. Heubeck and John C. Heubeck, Sl Segundo, for Defendants and Respondents.