California Court of Appeal

In a legal malpractice action, trial court judgment is affirmed where the court did not abuse its discretion in striking the testimony of plaintiff's damages expert as there was not a sufficient foundation for the expert's assumptions on market penetration and on her underlying assumption that plaintiff had a product to sell.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/11/2009
• Published 05/11/2009

Judges

• ARMSTRONG, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kosnett & Durchfort and David E. Durchfort, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Roy G. Weatherup, Bartley L. Becker, Los Angeles, and Allison Ann Arabian, Costa Mesa, for Defendant and Respondent.