California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

In re K.F., H032977

In an action challenging a restitution order, trial court order is affirmed with modifications where: 1) there was no evidence that the ambulance services constituted an incurred cost for purposes of restitution and thus the cost of of ambulance services should be subtracted from the restitution order; 2) there was insufficient evidence of wage loss by the victim; and 3) the award in the restitution order of the amount representing state disability benefits paid to the victim rather than losses incurred by him should be subtracted from the order.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/29/2009
  • Published 04/29/2009

Judges

  • RUSHING, P.J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Alex Coolman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Appellant, Attorney for Defendant and Appellant K.F., Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Martin S. Kaye, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Christina Vom Saal, Dorian Jung, Deputy Attorneys General, Attorneys for Plaintiff and Respondent The People.
Copied to clipboard