Conviction for lewd and lascivious conduct against a child is affirmed where: 1) trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence of previous accusations by the victim; 2) the court erred in allowing evidence of defendant's pre-arrest silence as substantive evidence of guilt in the case in chief, but the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; and 3) trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for mistrial as the display of a single word fairly characterizing the prosecutor's position did not constitute prosecutorial misconduct.