California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

People v. Uecker, C058061

Conviction and sentence for stalking is affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence to prove defendant stalked his victims; 2) defendant did not establish that the court prejudicially erred in admitting specific witness testimony regarding defendant's prior bad acts; 3) there was no abuse of discretion in admitting evidence that defendant is a registered sex offender; 4) the court had a reasonable basis for not exercising its discretion to dismiss defendant's strikes; and 5) defendant's sentence did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/24/2009
  • Published 03/24/2009


  • ROBIE, J.


  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • Richard Power, Concord, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant., Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Carlos A. Martinez, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Catherine Tennant Nieto, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Copied to clipboard