Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


In re Rozzo, D049704

Petition for writ of habeas corpus following Governor's reversal of a grant of parole is denied where: 1) there was some evidence to support the Governor's decision finding defendant unsuitable for parole; 2) defendant failed to establish that the Governor did not provide proper individualized consideration of his case, in violation of his right to due process; 3) defendant failed to demonstrate the Governor applies an anti-parole policy to persons convicted of murder that violates his constitutional right to due process; and 4) the composition of the Parole Board did not violate defendant's right to due process.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/16/2009
  • Published 03/16/2009

Judges

  • AARON, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Roger S. Hanson, Santa Ana, for Petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Anya M. Binsacca and Linnea D. Piazza, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard