Jury verdict finding criminal appellant to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) is affirmed as modified where: 1) the appeals court rejects appellant's meritless contentions that (a) the trial court failed to instruct the jury regarding his mental disorder and erroneously admitted evidence concerning treatment programs offered to SVP's; (b) his commitment was illegal for violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and (c) his trial counsel was ineffective; but 2) a two-year commitment order was invalid because it was made in derogation of the indeterminate commitment period mandated by Proposition 83, also known as Jessica's Law.