California Court of Appeal

In a suit alleging inverse condemnation, negligence, trespass, and nuisance against a county and its employees, judgment for county is affirmed where: 1) substantial evidence supported the finding that there was no compensable taking; 2) substantial evidence supported the judgment on the nuisance and trespass claims; 3) there was no showing that the court abused its discretion in its evidentiary rulings; and 4) plaintiffs had forfeited appellate review of their due-process violation claims.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/19/2008
• Published 01/16/2009

Judges

• DUFFY, J.

Court

• California Court of Appeal

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Ronald A. Zumbrun, Timothy B. Kassouni, Angela C. Thompson, Todd M. Ratshin, The Zumbrun Law Firm, Sacramento, Plaintiffs and Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Dana McRae, County Counsel, Jason M. Heath, Asst. County Counsel, Office of the Santa Cruz County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.