Skip to main content

California Court of Appeal


Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Office of Envtl. Health Hazard Assessment, B204987

Agency charged with implementing Proposition 65 did not abuse its discretion in listing di-isodecyl phthalate, which is used as a plasticizer in a wide variety of PVC plastic products, as a chemical known to cause reproductive toxicity under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/07/2009
  • Published 01/07/2009

Judges

  • SUZUKAWA, J.

Court

  • California Court of Appeal

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Latham & Watkins, William K. Rawson, Cassandra Sturkie, James L. Arnone, and Duncan Joseph Moore, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Ken Alex, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Edward G. Weil and Susan S. Fiering, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.
Copied to clipboard