Home insurer unsuccessfully appeals from a jury verdict in an insurance bad faith action arising from the destruction of Plaintiffs' home. Court finds that: 1) because the economic damages award stands in a reasonable, two-to-one relationship to the noneconomic damages award, the latter is not excessive; 2) regional claims adjusters employed by the insurer were "managing agents" for purposes of punitive damages; and 3) the punitive damages award does not raise due process concerns because it is roughly equal to the tort damages award.