California Court of Appeal

Reset A A Font size: Print

Mercury Ins. Co. v. Pearson, A119346

Pedestrian who was struck by an uninsured motorist while crossing an intersection with his fianc-e is not entitled to coverage under his fianc-e's auto insurance policy. Judgment in favor of auto insurer is affirmed where the policy unambiguously extends uninsured motorist coverage to pedestrians only if they are "named insureds" or their spouses or relatives living in the same household.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/04/2008
  • Published 01/05/2009




  • California Court of Appeal


  • For Appellees:
  • John Victor Hager and Holly C. Blackwell, Hager & Dowling, Santa Barbara, CA, for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent., Richard Allan Fischer, Sherman Oaks, CA, Esther Rubin Sorkin, Ball & Yorke, Ventura, CA, for Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Appellant.
Copied to clipboard